Would the legal warnings at the bottom of emails hold up in court?

Photo credit

…They are assumed to be a wise precaution. But they are mostly, legally speaking, pointless. Lawyers and experts on internet policy say no court case has ever turned on the presence or absence of such an automatic e-mail footer in America, the most litigious of rich countries.

Many disclaimers are, in effect, seeking to impose a contractual obligation unilaterally, and thus are probably unenforceable.

Source: The Economist

You should follow me on Facebook here. I’ve started posting extra content on that page. Don’t miss out; go here and hit the “Like” button.

You can also subscribe via Twitter, email, or RSS. Check out the site’s most popular posts of all time.

Related posts:

Do women receive lighter prison sentences than men? If so, why?

Are attractive people less likely to be convicted of a crime and more likely to get a shorter sentence?

Does the male/female wage gap extend to crime?

When does the sex of a judge affect their rulings?

Are lawyers any good at predicting the outcomes of their cases?

Can watching TV crime dramas distort perception of the criminal justice system?

Why you should only reference low numbers when you’re on trial for murder:

Does it work when a defendant tries to excuse away crimes by saying he was abused as a child?

How would the law punish Siamese twins if one committed murder without the other being involved?

You just committed murder. What should you do now?


Tags:
Posted In:
Post Details