Can you tell which cigarettes are most harmful by the color of the pack?

Photo credit

No, because all cigarettes present the same level of risk. But that’s not what many smokers think:

A study published in the journal Addiction polled over 8000 smokers from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the USA. Approximately one-fifth of those smokers incorrectly believed that “some cigarette brands could be less harmful than others.” False beliefs were highest among US smokers.

Current research shows that smokers base their perceptions of risk on pack colour, believing that ‘silver’, ‘gold’ and ‘white’ brands are less harmful to smoke than ‘black’ or ‘red’ brands.


Despite current prohibitions on the words ‘light’ and ‘mild’, smokers in Western countries continue falsely to believe that some cigarette brands may be less harmful than others. In fact, all conventional brands of cigarette present the same level of risk to smokers, including ‘mild’ and ‘low-tar’ brands.

Source: Science Daily

You should follow me on Facebook here. I’ve started posting extra content on that page. Don’t miss out; go here and hit the “Like” button.

You can also subscribe via Twitter, email, or RSS. Check out the site’s most popular posts of all time.

Related posts:

Do candy cigarettes turn kids into smokers?

Does addiction to cigarettes have very little to do with nicotine?

Is tobacco a gateway drug to marijuana?

What happens when nonsmokers wear nicotine patches?

What’s the historically important connection between chair upholstery and heart disease?

What takes more years off your life than smoking or obesity?

How long will you be miserable after quitting smoking?

Posted In:
Post Details