Can babies be “racist”?

Photo credit

Do infants develop meaningful social preferences among novel individuals based on their social group membership? If so, do these social preferences depend on familiarity on any dimension, or on a more specific focus on particular kinds of categorical information? The present experiments use methods that have previously demonstrated infants’ social preferences based on language and accent, and test for infants’ and young children’s social preferences based on race. In Experiment 1, 10-month-old infants took toys equally from own- and other-race individuals. In Experiment 2, 2.5-year-old children gave toys equally to own- and other-race individuals. When shown the same stimuli in Experiment 3, 5-year-old children, in contrast, expressed explicit social preferences for own-race individuals. Social preferences based on race therefore emerge between 2.5 and 5 years of age and do not affect social choices in infancy. These data will be discussed in relation to prior research finding that infants’ social preferences do, however, rely on language: a useful predictor of group or coalition membership in both modern times and humans’ evolutionary past.

Source: “Do infants show social preferences for people differing in race?” from Cognition

I’ve started posting extra content on the blog’s Facebook page. Don’t miss out; go here and hit the “Like” button.

Related posts:

Are anti-Semites more or less accurate at telling if someone is Jewish?

Does stereotyping increase with age?

Does race affect who gets voted off AMERICAN IDOL?

Is race less of a factor for African-Americans in getting a job than it was 15 years ago?

Do “African American” films make money or not?

You should follow the blog on Facebook here. You can also subscribe via email, RSS, or Twitter. Check out the site’s most popular posts of all time.

Posted In:
Post Details