When do groups prefer female leaders? When do they prefer male leaders?

Follow             bakadesuyo on Twitter

The glass cliff refers to women being more likely to rise to positions of organizational leadership in times of crisis than in times of success, and men being more likely to achieve those positions in prosperous times. We examine the role that (a) a gendered history of leadership and (b) stereotypes about gender and leadership play in creating the glass cliff. In Expt 1, participants who read about a company with a male history of leadership selected a male future leader for a successful organization, but chose a female future leader in times of crisis. This interaction – between company performance and gender of the preferred future leader – was eliminated for a counter-stereotypic history of female leadership. In Expt 2, stereotypically male attributes were most predictive of leader selection in a successful organization, while stereotypically female attributes were most predictive in times of crisis. Differences in the endorsement of these stereotypes, in particular with regard to the ascription of lower stereotypically female attributes to the male candidate mediated the glass cliff effect. Overall, results suggest that stereotypes about male leadership may be more important for the glass cliff effect than stereotypes about women and leadership.

Source: “The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts” from British Journal of Social Psychology, Volume 49, Number 3, September 2010 , pp. 433-451(19)

And:

This experiment investigated potential gender biases in the emergence of leadership in groups. Teams played a public-goods game under conditions of intra- or intergroup competition. We predicted and found a strong preference for female leaders during intragroup competition and male leaders during intergroup competition. Furthermore, during intragroup competition, a female leader was more instrumental than a male leader in raising group investments, but this pattern was reversed during intergroup competition. These findings suggest that particular group threats elicit specific gender-biased leader prototypes. We speculate about the evolutionary and cultural origins of these sex differences in the emergence of leadership.

Source: “Sex Differences in the Emergence of Leadership During Competitions Within and Between Groups” from Psychological Science

Follow me on Twitter here or get updates via email here.

Related posts:

How can you tell when the boss is lying?

Here’s why your boss is incompetent

Is having a trustworthy boss better than a big raise?


Tags:
Posted In:
Post Details