If you want a shorter prison sentence should you assault more people?

Follow             bakadesuyo on Twitter

Punishment should be sensitive to the severity of the crime. Yet in three studies the authors found that increasing the number of people victimized by a crime actually decreases the perceived severity of that crime and leads people to recommend less punishment for crimes that victimize more people. The authors further demonstrate the process behind the scope-severity paradox—the victim identifiability effect—and test a strategy for overcoming this bias. Although Studies 1 and 2 document this phenomenon in the lab, in Study 3 the authors used archival data to demonstrate that the scope-severity paradox is a robust, real-world effect. They collected archival data of actual jury verdicts spanning a 10-year period and found that juries required defendants to pay higher punitive damages when their negligent behavior harmed fewer people.

Source: “The Scope-Severity Paradox: Why Doing More Harm Is Judged to Be Less Harmful” from Social Psychological and Personality Science

Follow me on Twitter here or get updates via email here.

Related posts:

How would the law punish Siamese twins if one committed murder without the other being involved?

Do women receive lighter prison sentences than men? If so, why?

Are female psychopaths different from male psychopaths?


Tags:
Posted In:
Post Details