Should ghost hunters visit casinos?

That would probably be a very bad idea:

Numerous studies have shown paranormal believers misperceive randomness and are poor at judging probability. Despite the obvious relevance to many types of alleged paranormal phenomena, no one has examined whether believers are more susceptible to the ‘conjunction fallacy’; that is to misperceiving co-occurring (conjunct) events as being more likely than singular (constituent) events alone. The present study examines believer vs. non-believer differences in conjunction errors for both paranormal and non-paranormal events presented as either a probability or a frequency estimation task. As expected, believers made more conjunction errors than non-believers. This was true for both event types, with both groups making fewer errors for paranormal than for non-paranormal events. Surprisingly, the response format (probability vs. frequency) had little impact. Results are discussed in relation to paranormal believers’ susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy and more generally, to their propensity for probabilistic reasoning biases.

Source: “Paranormal belief and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy” from Applied Cognitive Psychology, Volume 23, Issue 4, pages 524–542, May 2009

Join over 130,000 readers. Get a free weekly update via email here.

Related posts:

You’re a female character in a horror film. Should you have sex?

Is belief in the paranormal a feminine trait?

Halloween Special Edition: Is there really cause to be worried about razor blades in kids’ halloween candy?

Posted In:
Post Details