Do high fines *encourage* tax evasion?
The economics-of-crime approach usually ignores the emotional cost and benefit of cheating. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between emotions, deception, and rational decision-making by means of an experiment on tax evasion. Emotions are measured by skin conductance responses and self-reports. We show that the intensity of anticipated and anticipatory emotions before reporting positively correlates with both the decision to cheat and the proportion of evaded income. The experienced emotional arousal after an audit increases with the monetary sanctions and the arousal is even stronger when the evader’s picture is publicly displayed. We also find that the risk of a public exposure of deception deters evasion whereas the amount of fines encourages evasion. These results suggest that an audit policy that strengthens the emotional dimension of cheating favors compliance.
Source: “Cheating, Emotions, and Rationality: An Experiment on Tax Evasion” from Experimental Economics 13, 2 (2010) 226-247
This book gives a fascinating look inside the IRS: Confessions of a Tax Collector: One Man’s Tour of Duty Inside the IRS. Don’t just take my word for it — 4.5 stars on Amazon with 46 reviews.
You should follow me on Twitter here. You can also subscribe to the blog’s feed or follow on Facebook. If you want to help support the blog, please do your Amazon shopping via this link. Here are the site’s most popular posts of all time.