Barking up the wrong tree

Background: In recent years there have been numerous attempts to define and measure happiness in various contexts and pertaining to a wide range of disciplines, ranging from neuroscience and psychology to philosophy, economics and social policy. This article builds on recent work by economists who attempt to estimate happiness regressions using large random samples of individuals in order to calculate monetary ‘compensating amounts’ for different life ‘events’.

Methods: We estimate happiness regressions using the ‘major life event’ and ‘happiness’ data from the British Household Panel Survey.

Results: The data and methods used in this article suggest that in contrast to living states such as ‘being married’, it is more events such as ‘starting a new relationship’ that have the highest positive effect on happiness. This is closely followed by ‘employment-related gains’ (in contrast to employment status). Also, women who become pregnant on average report higher than average levels of subjective happiness (in contrast to ‘being a parent’). Other events that appear to be associated with happiness according to our analysis include ‘personal education-related events’ (e.g. starting a new course, graduating from University, passing exams) and ‘finance/house related events’ (e.g. buying a new house). On the other hand, the event that has the highest negative impact upon happiness according to our analysis is ‘the end of my relationship’ closely followed by ‘death of a parent’. Adverse health events pertaining to the parents of the respondents also have a high negative coefficient and so does an employment-related loss.

Conclusion: The analysis presented in this article suggests that what matters the most in people's lives in Britain is to have good dynamic interpersonal relationships and to be respected at work with that respect being constantly renewed. These ‘goods’ are as much reflected through dynamic events as static situations. Relationships at work appear to be of a similar order of importance to those at home. Other factors that contribute to higher than average levels of subjective happiness, at least at a superficial level, include delaying death and keeping illness at bay, having babies, buying homes and cars and passing exams. The analysis presented here also suggests that people should not expect too much from their holidays and wider families. The findings presented in this article may help us to understand a little better the propensity for groups to be more or less happy and may help us to begin to better understand the importance of the dynamics of social context—the context in which we come to terms with reward and loss.

Source: "Measuring the impact of major life events upon happiness" from International Journal of Epidemiology 2007 36(6):1244-1252

My good friend Adam wrote 10 reflections based on my happiness posts. It's a heck of a lot more user-friendly than my own digest on happiness and I highly recommend you check it out.

Solid books on happiness are here and here.

Related posts:

What's the relationship between money, ambition, and happiness?

Is it all relative? How about happiness?

Does marriage really make people happier?

Does the meaning of "happiness" change as we age?

Does how much money your friends and neighbors make reduce your happiness?

How to make yourself happier in just a few seconds

What makes us happiest: work, love or leisure?

Can thinking quickly make you happy?

Things you didn't know about happiness

How does what you have and what you want affect happiness?

How to quickly and easily reduce heartache

Do happy people love their jobs or do good jobs make people happy?

Do negative emotions improve sports-watching?

Can crazy people hear happy voices?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.