Barking up the wrong tree

Just the interesting stuff. 
« Back to blog

"If you're reading this...then you are the worst man in history":

Many prehistoric Australian aboriginals could have outrun world 100 and 200 meters record holder Usain Bolt in modern conditions.

Some Tutsi men in Rwanda exceeded the current world high jump record of 2.45 meters during initiation ceremonies in which they had to jump at least their own height to progress to manhood.

Any Neanderthal woman could have beaten former bodybuilder and current California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in an arm wrestle.

These and other eye-catching claims are detailed in a book by Australian anthropologist Peter McAllister entitled "Manthropology" and provocatively sub-titled "The Science of the Inadequate Modern Male."

McAllister sets out his stall in the opening sentence of the prologue.

"If you're reading this then you -- or the male you have bought it for -- are the worst man in history.

"No ifs, no buts -- the worst man, period...As a class we are in fact the sorriest cohort of masculine Homo sapiens to ever walk the planet."

Delving into a wide range of source material McAllister finds evidence he believes proves that modern man is inferior to his predecessors in, among other fields, the basic Olympic athletics disciplines of running and jumping.

His conclusions about the speed of Australian aboriginals 20,000 years ago are based on a set of footprints, preserved in a fossilized claypan lake bed, of six men chasing prey.

FLEET-FOOTED ABORIGINALS

An analysis of the footsteps of one of the men, dubbed T8, shows he reached speeds of 37 kph on a soft, muddy lake edge. Bolt, by comparison, reached a top speed of 42 kph during his then world 100 meters record of 9.69 seconds at last year's Beijing Olympics.

In an interview in the English university town of Cambridge where he was temporarily resident, McAllister said that, with modern training, spiked shoes and rubberized tracks, aboriginal hunters might have reached speeds of 45 kph.

"We can assume they are running close to their maximum if they are chasing an animal," he said.

"But if they can do that speed of 37 kph on very soft ground I suspect there is a strong chance they would have outdone Usain Bolt if they had all the advantages that he does.

"We can tell that T8 is accelerating toward the end of his tracks."

McAllister said it was probable that any number of T8's contemporaries could have run as fast.

"We have to remember too how incredibly rare these fossilizations are," he said. "What are the odds that you would get the fastest runner in Australia at that particular time in that particular place in such a way that was going to be preserved?"

Turning to the high jump, McAllister said photographs taken by a German anthropologist showed young men jumping heights of up to 2.52 meters in the early years of last century.

STARK DECLINE

"It was an initiation ritual, everybody had to do it. They had to be able to jump their own height to progress to manhood," he said.

"It was something they did all the time and they lived very active lives from a very early age. They developed very phenomenal abilities in jumping. They were jumping from boyhood onwards to prove themselves."

McAllister said a Neanderthal woman had 10 percent more muscle bulk than modern European man. Trained to capacity she would have reached 90 percent of Schwarzenegger's bulk at his peak in the 1970s.

"But because of the quirk of her physiology, with a much shorter lower arm, she would slam him to the table without a problem," he said.

Manthropology abounds with other examples:

* Roman legions completed more than one-and-a-half marathons a day carrying more than half their body weight in equipment.

* Athens employed 30,000 rowers who could all exceed the achievements of modern oarsmen.

* Australian aboriginals threw a hardwood spear 110 meters or more (the current world javelin record is 98.48).

McAllister said it was difficult to equate the ancient spear with the modern javelin but added: "Given other evidence of Aboriginal man's superb athleticism you'd have to wonder whether they couldn't have taken out every modern javelin event they entered."

Why the decline?

"We are so inactive these days and have been since the industrial revolution really kicked into gear," McAllister replied. "These people were much more robust than we were.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Eric Barker 

Comments (8)

Oct 20, 2009
Cliff said...
Very dubious. The neanderthal sure, even an aborigine 20,000 years ago. But Romans or Greeks only 2,000 years ago??? It doesn't make any sense. Just living a hard, active life is not going to allow you to compete with modern Olympians and modern nutrition and training methods. no way.
Oct 20, 2009
frankl said...
ok, but if you got ill or had an accident, then it was too often "light's out" and life expectancy was about half the current one - and i wonder how the ancients would do in the ironman? endurance athletes today would crush, esp when you add in aquatics since ancient man was more of a drowner than a swimmer
Oct 20, 2009
Minivet said...
Yes, we're self-domesticated (the dubiousness of the historical assertions above aside). It's similar in kind (though not in degree) to the difference between an aurochs and a cow. We get other benefits in return; it's not a big deal.
Oct 20, 2009
yamahaeleven said...
Why waste personal physical resources on feats of prowess when a typical firearm gives the weakest modern denizen the power of a Roman Legion? The comparisons McAllister makes are amusing, but pointless.
Oct 20, 2009
jb said...
Its quite possible that Usain Bolt would beat the prehistoric guy (and his own olympic record) under the latter's conditions (without the modern advantage) if both were being chased by sabertooth's. Are there any other animal's footprints near T8's?

worst man athletically speaking maybe but surely not the sorriest. We don't need to be all that much athletically superior and make up in other attributes. Given the athletically superior prehistoric men what was their life expectancy at birth?

Oct 20, 2009
wally said...
This is silly. Evolution does not work this way.
Oct 21, 2009
dave said...
“We are so inactive these days and have been since the industrial revolution really kicked into gear,"

Shouldn't that mean that people before the industrial revolution would have been better than us now? But we know they weren't because our recorded history and fossil samples show us that they weren’t.

I don’t want to make too many judgments before reading this book but I am pretty skeptical at the moment.

Oct 22, 2009
tylerh said...
Ahh, yes. Selection bias. Men who survived to adulthood were more physical. Those who couldn't keep up this level of physicality didn't make it.

But notice who won: you and me and the rest of the flaccid bums we hang out with. And notice who is gone: most of the predators those fantastically fit men and women had to deal with.

So yes, this is a fun way to explore life in the pre-historic world, but more importantly shows how much greater control we modern human have over our environment.

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    Connect    twitter