Is this why we can do fun stuff for hours but work stresses us out?

I've always wondered why if something is "fun" we can do it for hours, yet if it's "work" it stresses us out and leaves us exhausted when the distinction between the two is often arbitrary and idiosyncratic. (Doing your taxes is frustrating while solving puzzles is fun. How different are they really?)

Certainly, interest in the task at hand is a big factor but this study touched on an interesting element as well:

This study examined pilots' vigilance during an extended general aviation flight as measured by their capacity to exercise control over the aircraft during a planned flight. Thirty-one qualified pilots flew a flight simulator from Wagga Wagga to Bankstown, Sydney, a distance of 207 nautical miles. The flight comprised five separate legs, although three legs were subjected to analysis. On the basis of attentional resource theory, it was hypothesised that task performance would differ based on the requirement for memory retrieval. Consistent with the hypothesis, the results revealed a deterioration in those tasks for which there was a substantial requirement for memory retrieval. Further analysis revealed that the deterioration in performance was best predicted by pilots' perception of the workload associated with the flight and their perception of their ability to exercise control over aircraft during normal conditions. The implications are discussed in terms of system design and training.

Source: "Vigilance decrement during a simulated general aviation flight" from Applied Cognitive Psychology

This very much ties in with flow, a concept proposed by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi which I strongly believe in.

The thing I'll probably be most likely to take away from the study above is the repetition of the word perception. Deterioration in performance had nothing to do with how much work there really was or the actual level of the pilot's skill. It was the pilot's perception of workload and skill.

Perhaps I'm being too picky about wording; maybe they mention perception here because that's all the pilot really could know. But the distinction might still remain, nonetheless.

In the latest Radiolab podcast (which I can't recommend strongly enough) they discussed the body's ability to regulate the perception of energy and pain. It seems the body has a governor of sorts that tells you how much gas you have left in the tank and doles out discomfort when it thinks you're working too hard. Turns out this regulator is extremely conservative. It tells us we can do no more long before our muscles actually give out.

Some people can ignore it. Those people run ultra-marathons and multi-state cycling races that last days. Their bodies aren't all that different than yours or mine. So, no, you don't get to look at them and say they are physically gifted freaks of nature. It seems the majority of what allows them to do what they do is mental.

A while back I posted about the techniques the Navy Seals started teaching which dramatically increased passing rates. None of them had anything to do with training the body.

So much of our ability to enjoy the good things and persevere the bad has little to do with the world as it is and much more to do with how we perceive it. Just something I'll be trying to keep in mind today.

(You can learn more about flow here.)

Related posts:

How to quickly and easily improve your life

How to pick a marriage partner

How to make yourself more lucky

How to get a job

How to resist temptation

How to make yourself happier in just a few seconds

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time

Do the women in rap videos vary based on what the song is about?

A content analysis of rap music videos taken from the end of year countdowns aired on U.S. cable outlets (i.e. BET, MTV, and VH1) was undertaken. The analysis examined the body images of 258 female characters (87.6% Black, 5.8% White, 6.6% other) as a function of the thematic content in the videos (e.g., violence, sex). It was found that, overall, “thin” females were overrepresented in the videos. More interestingly, the body sizes of the female characters varied by three of the four video themes. When the music videos were high in sex, or high in materialism, women were more likely to have smaller body sizes. In contrast, when the videos were high in political awareness, women were more likely to have larger body sizes.

Source: "Female Body Image as a Function of Themes in Rap Music Videos: A Content Analysis" from the journal "Sex Roles", DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9656-y

Some good rap is here and here.

Related posts:

Do song lyrics affect behavior?

Does rock music promote suicide?

How does the economy affect popular music?

Are opera fans more accepting of suicide?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time

Do you treat a $20 bill differently than twenty $1 dollar bills?

Labeled the “denomination effect,” study 1 shows in three field studies that the likelihood of spending is lower when an equivalent sum of money is represented by a single large denomination (e.g., one $20 bill) relative to many smaller denominations (e.g., 20 $1 bills). In two of the three field studies, individuals spent more once the decision to spend had been made. Study 2 then shows that consumers deliberately choose to receive money in a large denomination relative to small denominations when there is a need to exert self‐control in spending. Study 3 further shows that the denomination effect is contingent on individual differences in people’s desire to reduce the pain of paying associated with spending. The results suggest that the denomination effect occurs because large denominations are psychologically less fungible than smaller ones, allowing them to be used as a strategic device to control and regulate spending.

Source: "The Denomination Effect" from Journal of Consumer Research, DOI: 10.1086/599222

More on our irrational choices here.

Related posts:

What a well-placed $20 gets you

Loss Aversion in Golf

The behavioral economics of Thanksgiving

Do massive bonuses actually cause *poor* performance?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.

Is there a ‘marriage premium’ for gay men?

It is well-known that married men earn more than comparable single men, with typical estimates of the male marriage premium in the range of 10–20%. Some research also finds that cohabiting men earn more than men not living with a female partner. This study uses data from the General Social Survey and the National Health and Social Life Survey to examine whether a similar premium accrues to gay men who live with a male partner and whether cohabiting gay men have different observable characteristics than non-cohabiting gay men. Controlling for observable characteristics, cohabiting gay men do not earn significantly more than other gay men or more than unmarried heterosexual men. Cohabiting heterosexual men also do not earn more than non-cohabiting heterosexual men.

Source: "Is there a ‘marriage premium’ for gay men" from the journal "Review of Economics of the Household, Volume 6, Number 4 / December, 2008

An accessible introduction to economics is here.

Related posts:

Things you didn't know about marriage and relationships

What you should look for in a marriage partner

Does marriage make you poorer?

Is a marriage worth more to a man or a woman? By how much?

How important is physical attractiveness to a happy marriage?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.

You're a female character in a horror film. Should you have sex?

Looks like the old truism really is true:

The slasher horror film has been deplored based on claims that it depicts eroticized violence against predominately female characters as punishment for sexual activities. To test this assertion, a quantitative content analysis was conducted to examine the extent to which gender differences are evident in the association between character survival and engagement in sexual activities. Information pertaining to gender, engagement in sexual activities, and survival was coded for film characters from a simple random sample of 50 English-language, North American slasher films released between 1960 and 2009. Results indicated that sexual female characters were less likely to survive and had significantly longer death scenes as compared to those female characters who did not engage in sexual behaviors.

Source: "On the Perils of Living Dangerously in the Slasher Horror Film: Gender Differences in the Association Between Sexual Activity and Survival" by Andrew Welsh, Department of Criminology and Contemporary Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University

I am not a horror movie fan by any stretch. In fact, I've often argued that due to the conventions of the genre, making a good "horror film" almost de facto means making what is otherwise a bad film. Certainly, movies serve different purposes and pure spectacle is one of them, so I'm not saying they should be burned in the town square or anything.

Off the top of my head, there are a rare few that stand out as both good horror and good films and they are right here.

Related posts:

Does movie violence increase violent crime?

How does sex in movies affect box office?

How are female-directed porn movies different from male-directed porn movies?

Things you didn't know about sex

Are movie stars worth it?

How does the economy affect popular music?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.

Is fighting terrorism worth it?

Unlike many challenges, there is no solution to transnational terrorism because it is a cost-effective tactic of the weak against a more formidable opponent. Very cheap terrorist attacks can create significant anxiety – the material cost of a suicide attack may be as little as $150 and on average kills twelve people (Hoffman, 2006; Pape, 2006). Some rogue nations utilize terrorism as an inexpensive means to destabilize or harm other nations. Even effective antiterrorism campaigns will only temporarily work until the terrorists either find new leaders or sources of resources. Even if a terrorist group is annihilated, a new group may surface for some other cause. Thus, terrorism can be put into remission but it cannot be eliminated. Granting terrorist concessions will signal to future terrorists that terrorism pays, so that compromise may fuel future terrorist campaigns (Sandler and Arce, 2003).

Three of the five “solutions” proposed here – business-as-usual, increased proactive responses, and enhanced defensive measures – have very adverse benefit-cost ratios under a wide range of scenarios, even when the most promising assumptions are invoked. The most effective solutions are the cheapest, but they must overcome the greatest obstacles that require either greater international cooperation or more sensitive and farsighted policymaking. Such qualities seldom characterize rich countries’ actions.

Source

If you're curious about terrorism, I recommend this book.

Related posts:

Does terrorism work?

Why criminals hate terrorists

What's the secret to being a successful terrorist?

What we've learned from 77,000 terrorist incidents in 36 years

Does assassination promote democracy?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.

How sexy are sexist men?

In Studies 1 to 3, German female students (total N = 326) rated the likability and typicality of male targets: a nonsexist, a benevolent sexist, a hostile sexist, and (in Studies 2 and 3) an ambivalent sexist. When targets were presented as response profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick and Fiske 1996) (Studies 2 and 3), the benevolent sexist was rated to be most likable but least typical, whereas the ambivalent sexist was rated to be highly typical. Thus, women were aware of a link between benevolent and hostile sexism and approved of men’s benevolent sexism, especially when it was not paired with hostile sexism. Likability ratings were moderated by participants’ own benevolent sexism and feminist attitude.

Source:"How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory" from the journal "Sex Roles", DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9665-x

Now we can't be totally sure how representative this study is: it only sampled young German women. But for sake of argument let's say that, yes, women prefer a benevolent sexist over a non-sexist.

This makes sense from an economics perspective, I think. Women receive benefits from a benevolent sexist: holding open doors, "let me carry that heavy bag for you", "no, no, the man should pay", etc.

On the other hand, it's still sexism and knowing that can be a negative.

Does the former offest the latter? Or, are there more benefits than the direct ones I described above? For example: does a benevolently sexist man seem more masculine? And therefore make a woman feel more feminine?

I don't know the answer so I'd love to have female readers weigh in on this one. Is a (slightly) sexist man more sexy? Why?

Here's one of the fundamental texts of feminism.

Related posts:

Does the male/female wage gap extend to crime?

What's the deal with discrimination?

Are women getting unhappier?

Are "feminine" or "un-feminine" women more likely to be sexually harassed?

You know what has the power to dramatically improve women's lives? Brazilian soap operas.

Is kindness less optional for women than for men?

Are women held to higher standards than men at work?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.

Are most people happy?

Myers and Diener (1995) asked “Who is happy?” but examined the question of who is more and who is less happy In fact, most people report a positive level of subjective well-being (SWB), and say that they are satisfied with domains such as marriage, work, and leisure People in disadvantaged groups on average report positive well-being, and measurement methods in addition to self-report indicate that most people's affect is primarily pleasant Cross-national data suggest that there is a positive level of SWB throughout the world, with the possible exception of very poor societies In 86% of the 43 nations for which nationally representative samples are available the mean SWB response was above neutral Several hypotheses to explain the positive levels of SWB are discussed.

Source: "Most People Are Happy" from Psychological Science, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00354.x

Recommended books on happiness are here and here.

Related posts:

Things you didn't know about happiness

How to make yourself happier in just a few seconds

Does giving really make us happier than receiving?

How to find a place to live where you'll be happy

Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals?

Malcolm Gladwell on spaghetti sauce and happiness (Video)

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.

How do love and marriage differ in other cultures?

College students from secondary population centers in India, Pakistan, Thailand, Mexico, Brazil, Japan, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Australia, England, and the United States were asked to rate the importance of love for both the establishment and the maintenance of a marriage. Love tended to receive greatest importance in the Western and Westernized nations and least importance in the underdeveloped Eastern nations. These differences were stronger and clearer for decisions regarding the establishment of a marriage than for the maintenance and dissolution of a marriage. There were few significant sex differences, either across or within countries. Individualistic cultures, as opposed to collective cultures, assigned much greater importance to love in marriage decisions. Respondents assigning greater importance to love also tended to come from nations with higher economic standards of living, higher marriage rates and divorce rates, and lower fertility rates.

Source: "Love and Marriage in Eleven Cultures" from Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 5, 554-571 (1995)

Here is an excellent history of marriage that everyone should read.

Related posts:

Things you didn't know about marriage and relationships

Things you didn't know about sex

What you should look for in a marriage partner

Is marriage a good idea for handsome men?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.

What do Bond girls have in common?

A quantitative content analysis of 20 James Bond films assessed portrayals of 195 female characters. Key findings include a trend of more sexual activity and greater harm to females over time, but few significant across-time differences in demographic characteristics of Bond women. Sexual activity is predicted by race, attractiveness, size of role, and aggressive behaviors. Being a target of weapons is predicted by size of role, sexual activity, and weapon use, while being harmed is predicted principally by role. End-of-film mortality is predicted by sexual activity, ethical status (good vs. bad), and attempting to kill Bond. This identification of a link between sexuality and violent behavior is noted as a contribution to the media and sex roles literatures.

Source: "Shaken and Stirred: A Content Analysis of Women’s Portrayals in James Bond Film" from the journal "Sex Roles", 2009

Who'd thunk "attempting to kill Bond" would have negative consequences?

Probably the best Bond film. Best recent Bond film. Disagree with me? Post a comment. Warning: you best know your Bond before you start typing.

Related posts:

Things you didn't know about sex

Are men better gamblers when accompanied by a woman?

Why does popcorn cost so much at the movies?

Are Porn Stars Covered by OSHA laws?

What's more persuasive: fiction or non-fiction?

You should follow me on Twitter here or subscribe to this blog's feed. If you're a regular reader please support the blog by doing your book and movie shopping at the store. You'll find all my recommendations there. Here are the site's most popular posts of all time.