Are movie stars worth it?

Follow    bakadesuyo on Twitter

They definitely increase the revenue for a film but don’t increase the valuation of the companies that release the movies:

Is the involvement of stars critical to the success of motion pictures? Film studios, which regularly pay multimillion-dollar fees to stars, seem to be driven by that belief. This article sheds light on the returns on this investment using an event study that considers the impact of more than 1200 casting announcements on trading behavior in a simulated and real stock market setting. The author finds evidence that the involvement of stars affects movies’ expected theatrical revenues and provides insight into the magnitude of this effect. For example, the estimates suggest that, on average, stars are worth approximately $3 million in theatrical revenues. In a cross-sectional analysis grounded in the literature on group dynamics, the author also examines the determinants of the magnitude of stars’ impact on expected revenues. Among other things, the author shows that the stronger a cast already is, the greater is the impact of a newly recruited star with a track record of box office successes or with a strong artistic reputation. Finally, in an extension to the study, the author does not find that the involvement of stars in movies increases the valuation of film companies that release the movies, thus providing insufficient grounds to conclude that stars add more value than they capture. The author discusses implications for managers in the motion picture industry.

Source: “The Power of Stars: Do Star Actors Drive the Success of Movies?” from Journal of Marketing

Follow me on Twitter here or get updates via email here.

Related posts:

Who is Hollywood’s most overpaid star?

Do we reward the best people or the most visible people?

Why does popcorn cost so much at the movies?


Tags:
Posted In:
Post Details